Left foot of gimel
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Question: Does
the law of yud of the alef shin ayin etc. that are touching the body of the ois, straight
without a connecting oketz (SA 32:18), apply in gimel?
Note MS ois gimel
אם נדבק הירך בהרגל יגרור הירך ודי בכך
(if the left foot
is stuck to the right foot ..) – this can mean pic.1 because it is [like a]
nun, or also pic. 2?
It is accepted
here in Eretz Yisrael that there is a sfardi gimel that is written
m'lachatchila as pic.2, it is locali called "gimel Bagdadi" (the
gimel that Iraqi/Bagdad sofrim were custom to write), this is noted in Biur
Hasofer ibid. in the name of Da'as Kdoshim – that this gimel is csav velish. [Old
csav velish, but today all sofrim sfardim don’t write the gimel so, rather like an
ashkenazic gimel the left foot separated from the guf. Even sofrim from the
iraqi community today don't write a gimel as prescribed "gimel Bagdadi"].
Questions:
1) can there be a change hallachicaly, that a
gimel once accepted as kosher [even l'chatchila] is now pasul bdieved?
2) If the gimel was kosher for velish/bagdad
does that make it automaticaly kosher [bdieved] for ashknazim (then, or even
now)?
Bezras Hashem to
be continued next week.
Popular posts from this blog
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Question to Yosef Chaim B
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
Comments
Post a Comment