A place for English speaking sofrim (scribes), magihim (examiners), rabbis and vendors of Stam (Torah, Tefillin and Mezuzah scrolls) from around the world to communicate, share ideas, ask questions and offer support and advice.
I asked R' Shammai this morning...The only thing that seemed to bother him was the Beis which he said is a Shailos Tinnok. The rest he said are ok and should be fixed (aside for Shem HaShem which he said he would be machshir but of course shouldn't fix.)
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
Post the same picture however without the circles...
ReplyDeleteMark it in a different way or not at all...
Thanks
I can't thats the scan I received. sorry...
ReplyDeleteenlarge and you can see quite clear.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou're right..Just even when I enlarged it it was still bothering a little to look at it that way with the circles
ReplyDeleteI asked R' Shammai this morning...The only thing that seemed to bother him was the Beis which he said is a Shailos Tinnok. The rest he said are ok and should be fixed (aside for Shem HaShem which he said he would be machshir but of course shouldn't fix.)
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteGot to find out who is behind the pen....
ReplyDeleteGot to find out who is behind the pen...
ReplyDelete