Hak Techot

By -
My question is about the Chet in Nuach...
After finishing the letter, I was trying to strengthen the Hatoteret and the ink blotted and filled up the whole space (so that the heads are no longer visible, there is just a thick line) in between the two heads of the Zayin and Vav (of the Chet). I latter made some of the correction because I was sure that the letter was still Kosher and that the Tzuras Ois was not lost.

Then I realized that maybe I made a mistake, I figured since the Rashi holds this shape of the Chet, that I was allowed to make the correction and it would not be Hak Techot. I will surely destroy the letter and rewrite, but my question is... would the letter be kosher bedieved, or lechatchila if at all kosher if I left it?

Comments

  1. Beis HastamFebruary 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM

    KOSHER AS IS

    ReplyDelete
  2. Beis HastamFebruary 12, 2012 at 7:00 PM

    If you learn tzemach tzadik 205 -learn 206 as well

    ReplyDelete
  3. OneDayFebruary 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OneDayFebruary 12, 2012 at 7:20 PM

    thanks, i,m not familiar with that sefer. Tried looking it up but could not find it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. aaaFebruary 12, 2012 at 11:16 PM

    Its not Nuach But VNoach ונח

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rabbi Eli GutnickFebruary 13, 2012 at 3:40 AM

    Pshhhh, I'm impressed, Bais Hastam quoting the Tzemach Tzedek!

    Truth be said he allows fixing by scratching, Bais Hastam is correct.

    P.S. Is the megillah for sale?

    ReplyDelete
  7. moshe weinerFebruary 13, 2012 at 4:45 AM

    צמח צדיק Tzemach Tzadik is a sefer chasidus written by the holy master Rabbi Menahem Mendel Of Viznitz
    צמח צדק Tzemach Tzedek is a sefer shu"t (responsa) in hallacha written by the holy master Rabbi Menahem Mendel Of Lubavitch

    ReplyDelete
  8. OneDayFebruary 13, 2012 at 9:09 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more