kotz Rabenu-Tam

By -

The kotz Rabenu-Tam is not at the left edge of the yud. I think that although lechatchila it should be made at the left edge, and in the given examples lechatchila should be fixed [if easily accomplished], bdieved it is kosher - since basicaly the yud has a protrusion on the general left part.

Other thoughts/opinions would be appreciated.

Comments

  1. Rabbi Eli GutnickFebruary 21, 2012 at 5:03 AM

    Personally I'm pretty "fix happy" but I don't know if I'd bother fixing these, particularly in the first instance where you could almost say the kotz comes out of the right corner since it comes in on an angle.

    It is not uncommon for sofrim not to leave an adequate kotz RT and sometimes if this is a consistent problem in the ksav I make a special hagoha just for kotz RT.

    Having said that I have gotten myself into a pickle several times as when you are jumping quickly from yud to yud adding the kotz RT it is very easy to add a kotz to shaim hashem without being mekadesh the shaim, as you are looking at the letter, not the word. This in all likelihood would be meakev in the case where the corner is round and hence possul bedieved, since you were machshir the os without being makdish the shaim.

    You cannot scratch it off and rewrite lishmah as you could by a regular yud since it would be mechikas hashem.

    My tikkun in such a case is to thicken the kotz leshaim kedushas and at least a chelek of the kotz is kosher, which is all you need. I heard this is acceptable according to Rav Shammai Gross.

    ReplyDelete
  2. moshe weinerFebruary 21, 2012 at 7:03 AM

    obvoiusly you meant: "left corner"

    Personally I'm pretty "fix happy" but I don't know if I'd bother fixing these, particularly in the first instance where you could almost say the kotz comes out of the left corner since it comes in on an angle.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rabbi Eli GutnickFebruary 21, 2012 at 9:40 AM

    yes, left corner, of course

    ReplyDelete
  4. Beis HastamFebruary 21, 2012 at 2:17 PM

    mukaf gvul problem?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more