Dio - Min hamuter b'ficha

By -
I admit that I found a Rishon that clearly says - the dyo must be mutar bficha, as all the rabbis mentioned in the blog claimed.
The tshuva is from Rabbi Eliezer ben Natan from Lunel [ba'al sefer Hamanhig].
see in source:
http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=31524&st=&pgnum=34&hilite=

ויראה הטעם מדכ' למען תהי' תורת ה' בפיך צריך שכל
עשיית התורה לשם ה׳ בין עשיית העורות בין הכתיבה .. וכתי

Comments

  1. Avraham Chaim BloomenstielMarch 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Avraham Chaim BloomenstielMarch 5, 2012 at 10:30 AM

    Are you sure that this pertains to the kashrus of the material or the need for lishma?

    ReplyDelete
  3. moshe weinerMarch 5, 2012 at 12:18 PM

    It is quite clear in the teshuva. Why don't you open the source given and see yourself - He basicaly follows the first terutz of the Dvar Shmuel that stam yaynam in the ink is permitted because it is destroyed in becoming ink.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Avraham Chaim BloomenstielMarch 5, 2012 at 12:55 PM

    "Why don't you open the source given and see yourself"

    I can only see the part that you quoted right now - only have access to the forum via my phone at the moment. Will take a look at full teshuva when I get to the office. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Avraham Chaim BloomenstielMarch 5, 2012 at 3:58 PM

    Wow - I see it. How did you find this?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

The forum is back online...for reference and research purposes.

By -
 Dear Readers and Members, The forum has been down for over 6 months because the domain name (www.stamforum.com) lapsed and it is no longer available to re purchase. Although this forum is now defunct (it has morphed into several whatsapp groups), I have had many requests to put it back online because it contains so much information (over 1,800 posts and thousands of comments in the discussions, on a wide range of topics related to STa"M). I have therefore put the forum back online at blogger, so the address is www.stamforum.blogspot.com. The forum lasted for a decade...not a bad effort! It was pretty popular back in the days before whatsapp and managed to receive over a million hits in it's short life. It was one of the only organised forums in the  STa"M world and definitely the largest in it's heyday. I would like to thank all those who cobtributed over the years, particularly the early members who helped build it up. Thanking you all, Eli
Read more