A place for English speaking sofrim (scribes), magihim (examiners), rabbis and vendors of Stam (Torah, Tefillin and Mezuzah scrolls) from around the world to communicate, share ideas, ask questions and offer support and advice.
It is very hard to tell from this picture because the mezuzah is curved exactly where the chaf is which may make it look slightly narrower than it is in actuality and with something close like this it could make the whole difference.
I agree - this is a sh'elat tinok. Looks very much like a nun, even though his normal nunim seem to have a very thick base elsewhere, which is a little odd in itself.
I received this question via email. I am not really a klaf expert, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question: Dear Rabbi Gutnick, I am writing to you because a good friend of mine has put the idea into my head that the klaf in my tefillin were not really tanned and therefore are not kosher. He referred me to Megilla 19a re diftera. From the research that I have done so far, it seems that the klaf that is used today is tanned only with a lime wash. On all of the tanning websites I’ve seen so far, they say that the lime doesn’t accomplish tanning but only the removal of the hair and some other pre-tanning effects. Would you be able to explain to me or refer me to a website that explains how the tanning process that is used today takes the hide out of the category of diftera? Thank you very much.
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
It is very hard to tell from this picture because the mezuzah is curved exactly where the chaf is which may make it look slightly narrower than it is in actuality and with something close like this it could make the whole difference.
ReplyDeleteit is a shaylas tinok.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree - this is a sh'elat tinok. Looks very much like a nun, even though his normal nunim seem to have a very thick base elsewhere, which is a little odd in itself.
ReplyDeleteIf forced to pasken I would say it just makes it as a chaf, however, I wouldn't disagree with those who say to ask a tinok.
ReplyDeleteTinok read Nun.
ReplyDelete