Another chok techos sheila
A pencil mark, left by a careless magiha, inside the bottom left space of a chaf pshuta.
Permissable to erase or no?
Permissable to erase or no?
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Question to Yosef Chaim B
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
Megillah yes. Tefillin or Mezzuzah, no. It is Chok Tochot. See the Mishnah Berrurah on O"H 32:17.
ReplyDeletethere are that permit to erase if it obvious not dyo and the caf is clear - not a hay.
ReplyDeletethis question may need more clarification and a shaylas rav.
I remember the mishnah berurah as permitting then quoting the pri megadim as a machmir but why would it make a difference whether or not the caf is clearly not a heh and not be solely talui on whether the pencil mark is dyo or not?
Deletealso depends on darkness
ReplyDeleteWhy would chak tochot apply any less to a megilla?
ReplyDeleteChok Tochot is not a problem regarding a megillah unless it is Rov HaMegillah. A single letter, not an issue.
DeleteR' Michael, I would still venture to say that it should not be done lechatchila.
ReplyDeleteThe halacha of up to half a megilla missing and still being yotzei keriy'a is bediavad - can you really tell a sofer lechatchila to perform chak tochot? Any more than you could tell a sofer to lechatchila leave out words in a megilla? Regardless of whether one would be yotzei if it happened...
Secondly (and I'm not sure on this point so your input is appreciated) - perhaps chak tochot is a different halacha than that of chaser v'yeter. Chaser v'yeter (or another type of psul) it is clearly apparent when an inyan or rov is pasul or missing. However chak tochot, how would someone know if potentially half or most or the beginning was done through chak tochot? This being the case perhaps with chak tochot the halacha would be different, since it's impossible to discern?
Chaser or Yeter Ot would make the Megillah Possul. The Yeriat Shlomo rules(in the name of the Kol Yaakov 691:9, Birkei Yosef 691:2 Kesset HaSofer 28 Liskat Sofer S"K 2 Pri Megadim 691:1 and several others) that so long as the majority of the megillah was written k'din there is no choshesh of chok tochot in a megillah.
DeleteRav Ovadia Yosef in Chazon Ovadia p 245 says specifically that Chok Tochot may be done l'chatchila as tikun on a megilla.
Now regarding a pencil mark, if it is the size of a regel of a yud of the same writing, it doesn't matter color or shade it is a possul that cannot be fixed by erasing just the pagum.
Chaser veyeter should have the same din as a psul in tzurat haot or chak tochot...no?
DeleteInteresting on R Ovadia being machshir even lechatchila. What's the svara?
In a Megillah, not according to the sources quoted. A chaser or a yeter is a posul. If up to half the megillah was written by means of chok tochot it is still kosher.
DeleteAs far as Rav Ovadiah's savara, I try not to boil down his teshuvot into anything that will fit into a blogger comment box.
I've subsequently found in chayei Aryeh (O"C Siman 8) who clearly is machshir specifically speaking about chak tochot as well as any other psul in a megilla, even though there's a svara (and indeed some hold this way) that a Psul is worse than chaser veyeter and is not kosher.
ReplyDeleteHowever, my first point and my questions I think still stand. Ie:
1) this is all a case of bediavad. Lechatchila sofrim can't write megillot via chak tochot etc
This is also obvious because a megilla is only kosher if Pasul in this way if already read or if a kosher one isn't available (MB 691:14)! Certainly lechatchila it is not good even for keriy'a!
2) is there not a svara that davka chak tochot is different because it cannot be distinguished and therefore one wouldn't know if most or a whole inyan was Pasul?