In today’s day and age, virtually every kosher product available to the consumer comes with a hechsher. By hechsher, I mean an official and recognised rabbinical body or agency that certifies the kashrus of a product, be it a food item or a religious article. Hechsherim play a vital role in providing consumer confidence, and something branded by a reputable kashrus agency will be considered more legitimate than a similar product that does not. The agency has rigid policies and protocols in place to ensure correct standards are met, and they are independent of the manufacturer so that there is no conflict of interest. As we have discussed on this forum previously, there is a distinct lack of official hechsherim on Sta”m products - Tefillin, Mezuzos and Sifrei Torah. Even the Vaad Mishmeres Sta”m, the oldest and most well- known rabbinic agency in the Sta”m world does not certify products. They test and ordain sofrim and magihim (examiners), offer a computer checking service (sp...
I think there is no hallachic problem, even in regard to the klaf behind the shemos. But, in regard to the latter (the klaf behind the shemos) I would think it over or consult another Rabbi.
ReplyDeleteTo sand off to much on the "hair side" is problematic, as understood from the שו"ע:
ReplyDeleteוקלפים שלנו שאין חולקים אותם יש להם דין קלף וכותבים עליהם לצד בשר שמה שמגררים קליפתו העליונה שבמקום שער אינו אלא כדי מה שצריך לתקנו ולהחליקו ואפילו אם היו חולקים העור לשנים היה צריך לגרר ממנו כך ומצד הבשר גוררים הרבה עד שאין נשאר אלא הקלף בלבד.
And there is the חיי אדם that says that if you take off the to much the klaf isn't kosher etc.( see ביאור הלכה).
(and some even say that the standard klaf that is sold has to much from the "hair side" rubbed off).
So the question is also how much can you sand off and it should still be considered "klaf"?
As I understand it that issue is only because of the writing. That is, if too little is taken off the meat side or too much off the hair side then you're writing on duchsustus and not klaf.
ReplyDeleteIn this case he's already written on the klaf so there shouldn't be an issue.