A place for English speaking sofrim (scribes), magihim (examiners), rabbis and vendors of Stam (Torah, Tefillin and Mezuzah scrolls) from around the world to communicate, share ideas, ask questions and offer support and advice.
It's hard to tell from the photo but I don't think that its thin or light enough to be insignificant. Also, especially with a mem that often has a very small connection at the chartom.
Since a) the only reason we know its a nun yud is really because of the tagim (and a little bit the tzavar of the nun) which have little affect on tzurat ha'ot and b) a mem with a very short chartum is kosher, what's the svara for allowing a tinok? (Sources?)
There are 3 unique changes from a mem: 1) the nun part - all of it, 2) the chartom yud is short, 3) tagim. This would never be accepted as a kosher mem, therefore it is a shaylas tinok in regard to what this is. Sorry no sources available, just my svara alone.
Based on the changes mentioned by Rav Moshe, I'd ask a shailos chacham. I'd not be surprised if he would be mekel. If a tinok did need to be asked, it is highly unlikely they'd call it a mem and likely they'd read the 2 letters correctly.
You are correct that the regel yud is longer than the regel reish. Honestly, I didn't really check further once I got to the nun/yud.
However, a yud being longer than a reish is not inherently pasul. Perhaps the reish is really short? As we know regel reish only needs to be (l'ikuva) k'mlo ot ketana, which according to mikdash me'at is regel yud. (I know acc to MB it's a yud - discussion for another time).
In this case, if you look at the thickness of the gag of the Reish, the regel of the Reish is about the same length, maybe a tiny smidge longer, but we could say that the regel Reish is about a kulmus. Compare it with the height of the rest of the letters in the word "uvisharecha". A kulmus is an acceptable length for regel yud. I'm not saying this yud is definitely ok just yet.
Obviously a big factor in determining yud/vav status is the context of the particular ktav being discussed. In this mezuza most of the yudim have a regel of at least a kulmus, whereas all of the vavim have regalim of 2-3 kulmusim. In context this means that the yudim are ok. This particular yud however would depend on which side of the line we see it falling. Also take into account that the gag thickness of this yud is greater than most of the vavim, so it's proportions are not totally equal. I'm not convinced it's a vav. Compare it with the vav of that same word.
I received this question via email. I am not really a klaf expert, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question: Dear Rabbi Gutnick, I am writing to you because a good friend of mine has put the idea into my head that the klaf in my tefillin were not really tanned and therefore are not kosher. He referred me to Megilla 19a re diftera. From the research that I have done so far, it seems that the klaf that is used today is tanned only with a lime wash. On all of the tanning websites I’ve seen so far, they say that the lime doesn’t accomplish tanning but only the removal of the hair and some other pre-tanning effects. Would you be able to explain to me or refer me to a website that explains how the tanning process that is used today takes the hide out of the category of diftera? Thank you very much.
Dear Readers and Members, The forum has been down for over 6 months because the domain name (www.stamforum.com) lapsed and it is no longer available to re purchase. Although this forum is now defunct (it has morphed into several whatsapp groups), I have had many requests to put it back online because it contains so much information (over 1,800 posts and thousands of comments in the discussions, on a wide range of topics related to STa"M). I have therefore put the forum back online at blogger, so the address is www.stamforum.blogspot.com. The forum lasted for a decade...not a bad effort! It was pretty popular back in the days before whatsapp and managed to receive over a million hits in it's short life. It was one of the only organised forums in the STa"M world and definitely the largest in it's heyday. I would like to thank all those who cobtributed over the years, particularly the early members who helped build it up. Thanking you all, Eli
Ask a tinok if he reads them nun yud, yuo may scrape the negiya. If he reads them mem, or fails to read one of these letters - gniza!
ReplyDeletethe fact that it is a yud and not a vov - it does not reach the moshav of the nun - is tzad to be meikel
ReplyDeleteSince a) the only reason we know its a nun yud is really because of the tagim (and a little bit the tzavar of the nun) which have little affect on tzurat ha'ot and b) a mem with a very short chartum is kosher, what's the svara for allowing a tinok? (Sources?)
ReplyDeleteThere are 3 unique changes from a mem: 1) the nun part - all of it, 2) the chartom yud is short, 3) tagim.
ReplyDeleteThis would never be accepted as a kosher mem, therefore it is a shaylas tinok in regard to what this is.
Sorry no sources available, just my svara alone.
Based on the changes mentioned by Rav Moshe, I'd ask a shailos chacham. I'd not be surprised if he would be mekel. If a tinok did need to be asked, it is highly unlikely they'd call it a mem and likely they'd read the 2 letters correctly.
ReplyDeleteWhat about Uvish'orecha? The Yud is longer than the Reish.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct that the regel yud is longer than the regel reish. Honestly, I didn't really check further once I got to the nun/yud.
ReplyDeleteHowever, a yud being longer than a reish is not inherently pasul. Perhaps the reish is really short? As we know regel reish only needs to be (l'ikuva) k'mlo ot ketana, which according to mikdash me'at is regel yud. (I know acc to MB it's a yud - discussion for another time).
In this case, if you look at the thickness of the gag of the Reish, the regel of the Reish is about the same length, maybe a tiny smidge longer, but we could say that the regel Reish is about a kulmus. Compare it with the height of the rest of the letters in the word "uvisharecha". A kulmus is an acceptable length for regel yud. I'm not saying this yud is definitely ok just yet.
Obviously a big factor in determining yud/vav status is the context of the particular ktav being discussed. In this mezuza most of the yudim have a regel of at least a kulmus, whereas all of the vavim have regalim of 2-3 kulmusim. In context this means that the yudim are ok. This particular yud however would depend on which side of the line we see it falling. Also take into account that the gag thickness of this yud is greater than most of the vavim, so it's proportions are not totally equal. I'm not convinced it's a vav. Compare it with the vav of that same word.
The Yud is kosher (as is the Reish)
ReplyDelete