A place for English speaking sofrim (scribes), magihim (examiners), rabbis and vendors of Stam (Torah, Tefillin and Mezuzah scrolls) from around the world to communicate, share ideas, ask questions and offer support and advice.
It's hard to tell from the photo but I don't think that its thin or light enough to be insignificant. Also, especially with a mem that often has a very small connection at the chartom.
Since a) the only reason we know its a nun yud is really because of the tagim (and a little bit the tzavar of the nun) which have little affect on tzurat ha'ot and b) a mem with a very short chartum is kosher, what's the svara for allowing a tinok? (Sources?)
There are 3 unique changes from a mem: 1) the nun part - all of it, 2) the chartom yud is short, 3) tagim. This would never be accepted as a kosher mem, therefore it is a shaylas tinok in regard to what this is. Sorry no sources available, just my svara alone.
Based on the changes mentioned by Rav Moshe, I'd ask a shailos chacham. I'd not be surprised if he would be mekel. If a tinok did need to be asked, it is highly unlikely they'd call it a mem and likely they'd read the 2 letters correctly.
You are correct that the regel yud is longer than the regel reish. Honestly, I didn't really check further once I got to the nun/yud.
However, a yud being longer than a reish is not inherently pasul. Perhaps the reish is really short? As we know regel reish only needs to be (l'ikuva) k'mlo ot ketana, which according to mikdash me'at is regel yud. (I know acc to MB it's a yud - discussion for another time).
In this case, if you look at the thickness of the gag of the Reish, the regel of the Reish is about the same length, maybe a tiny smidge longer, but we could say that the regel Reish is about a kulmus. Compare it with the height of the rest of the letters in the word "uvisharecha". A kulmus is an acceptable length for regel yud. I'm not saying this yud is definitely ok just yet.
Obviously a big factor in determining yud/vav status is the context of the particular ktav being discussed. In this mezuza most of the yudim have a regel of at least a kulmus, whereas all of the vavim have regalim of 2-3 kulmusim. In context this means that the yudim are ok. This particular yud however would depend on which side of the line we see it falling. Also take into account that the gag thickness of this yud is greater than most of the vavim, so it's proportions are not totally equal. I'm not convinced it's a vav. Compare it with the vav of that same word.
I recently tried this kosher ink for my rapidograph and I am extremely pleased with it. It does not clog the nib like other kosher rapidograph inks, and it's very dark and strong. It's at least as good as the Rotring commercial grade rapidograph inks (of course these can only be used with batch numbers that have been lab tested and approved kosher), and in addition you do not need to add a drop of regular Sta"m ink (as per the instruction of the Shevet Halevi, which is messy and time consuming). I was wondering if anyone else had an opinion or comments with regards to their experience with this ink...
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
In today’s day and age, virtually every kosher product available to the consumer comes with a hechsher. By hechsher, I mean an official and recognised rabbinical body or agency that certifies the kashrus of a product, be it a food item or a religious article. Hechsherim play a vital role in providing consumer confidence, and something branded by a reputable kashrus agency will be considered more legitimate than a similar product that does not. The agency has rigid policies and protocols in place to ensure correct standards are met, and they are independent of the manufacturer so that there is no conflict of interest. As we have discussed on this forum previously, there is a distinct lack of official hechsherim on Sta”m products - Tefillin, Mezuzos and Sifrei Torah. Even the Vaad Mishmeres Sta”m, the oldest and most well- known rabbinic agency in the Sta”m world does not certify products. They test and ordain sofrim and magihim (examiners), offer a computer checking service (sp...
Ask a tinok if he reads them nun yud, yuo may scrape the negiya. If he reads them mem, or fails to read one of these letters - gniza!
ReplyDeletethe fact that it is a yud and not a vov - it does not reach the moshav of the nun - is tzad to be meikel
ReplyDeleteSince a) the only reason we know its a nun yud is really because of the tagim (and a little bit the tzavar of the nun) which have little affect on tzurat ha'ot and b) a mem with a very short chartum is kosher, what's the svara for allowing a tinok? (Sources?)
ReplyDeleteThere are 3 unique changes from a mem: 1) the nun part - all of it, 2) the chartom yud is short, 3) tagim.
ReplyDeleteThis would never be accepted as a kosher mem, therefore it is a shaylas tinok in regard to what this is.
Sorry no sources available, just my svara alone.
Based on the changes mentioned by Rav Moshe, I'd ask a shailos chacham. I'd not be surprised if he would be mekel. If a tinok did need to be asked, it is highly unlikely they'd call it a mem and likely they'd read the 2 letters correctly.
ReplyDeleteWhat about Uvish'orecha? The Yud is longer than the Reish.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct that the regel yud is longer than the regel reish. Honestly, I didn't really check further once I got to the nun/yud.
ReplyDeleteHowever, a yud being longer than a reish is not inherently pasul. Perhaps the reish is really short? As we know regel reish only needs to be (l'ikuva) k'mlo ot ketana, which according to mikdash me'at is regel yud. (I know acc to MB it's a yud - discussion for another time).
In this case, if you look at the thickness of the gag of the Reish, the regel of the Reish is about the same length, maybe a tiny smidge longer, but we could say that the regel Reish is about a kulmus. Compare it with the height of the rest of the letters in the word "uvisharecha". A kulmus is an acceptable length for regel yud. I'm not saying this yud is definitely ok just yet.
Obviously a big factor in determining yud/vav status is the context of the particular ktav being discussed. In this mezuza most of the yudim have a regel of at least a kulmus, whereas all of the vavim have regalim of 2-3 kulmusim. In context this means that the yudim are ok. This particular yud however would depend on which side of the line we see it falling. Also take into account that the gag thickness of this yud is greater than most of the vavim, so it's proportions are not totally equal. I'm not convinced it's a vav. Compare it with the vav of that same word.
The Yud is kosher (as is the Reish)
ReplyDelete