Help shaaloh on a tof. I was writing and this taf got filled in if someone could answer i would really apreciate it.
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Question to Yosef Chaim B
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
The rule is that if the inside is an upside down V and the top of the V is pointy ie the two raglayim are touching each other at that point without any gug (to square off the top of the V)then it is a shinuy tzurah. So I was instructed by Rav Friedlander. Thefefore this case its hard to be machshir.
ReplyDeletePerhaps Reb Moshe would like to pasken
Someone showed in the book mishnas hasofer page tzatik alef a yalkut sofer at the end that he is machshir
ReplyDeleteany feedback would be appreciated in yalkut he seems to be medameh a top part of a letter to a bottom one i wonder what was rabbi friedlanders moker to be machmir i even think in this case there is a part which goes a little bit on a lesser slant
ReplyDeleteworse case you can still go back from end of Shma and be megarrer until the tav assuming you did not write the next parsha of vehaya. Theres no shem HaShem. Are these rabbenu tam ? To me the tsurah is still a tav.
ReplyDeletethese are rabeinu tam already wrote vehaya
ReplyDeleteI think it must be shown to a posek
ReplyDeleteRabi vazner paskened that ot is kpsher and can be scraped off
ReplyDeleteRabi vazner paskened that ot is kpsher and can be scraped off
ReplyDelete