Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
Psulah. Not fixable.
ReplyDeleteIts a really difficult one. I wonder what Reb Moshe thinks?
ReplyDeletepassul
Deleteכשר
ReplyDeleteשו"ע אדה"ז סי' לב סעי' כ, סי' לו סעי' א
ב"י בצורת אות וא"ו בשם המנהיג
In ל"ב the Rav discusses a short Vav, not this case where there is no discernible Rosh/Regel. In ל"ו א there is nothing about this at all
Deleteלא נתנו שיעור לעובי האותיות ויכול לעשותן דקות מאד אפי' לכתחילה - סי' לב, כ
ReplyDeleteלא פסל אא"כ הפסיד צורת האות לגמרי - סי' לו, א
may be thin but needs tzuras haos
ReplyDeleteב"י בצורת אות וא"ו בשם המנהיג
ReplyDeletethe צורה of a וא"ו is a hook