Popular posts from this blog
Klaff Tanning question:
By
Rabbi Eli Gutnick
-
I received this question via email. I am not really a klaf expert, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question: Dear Rabbi Gutnick, I am writing to you because a good friend of mine has put the idea into my head that the klaf in my tefillin were not really tanned and therefore are not kosher. He referred me to Megilla 19a re diftera. From the research that I have done so far, it seems that the klaf that is used today is tanned only with a lime wash. On all of the tanning websites I’ve seen so far, they say that the lime doesn’t accomplish tanning but only the removal of the hair and some other pre-tanning effects. Would you be able to explain to me or refer me to a website that explains how the tanning process that is used today takes the hide out of the category of diftera? Thank you very much.
Rabbi Reuvain Mendlowitz clarifies his position on Ksav Chabad (and my final thoughts)
By
Rabbi Eli Gutnick
-
Last week I posted some thoughts in response to a public lecture given by Rabbi Reuvain Mendlowitz regarding Ksav Chabad (the Alter Rebbe's ksav). I felt he did not represent the issue fairly, and since I had received questions about it from a number of people I felt it made sense to write a general response. After I posted my response on this forum, Rabbi Mendlowitz reached out to me by email and we ended up having a respectful and productive email exchange regarding the relevant issues surrounding Ksav Chabad. His position is a lot clearer to me now, and I think he also took certain things on board that I clarified with him. The purpose of the Stam Forum (at least back in it's heyday before all the whats app groups took over) was to connect sofrim from around the world, to promote achdus and build bridges, as well as to offer support and advice. In that spirit, I felt I should write a follow up post, to clarify some of the issues and misconception...


The second zayin looks a bit like a nun-sofit to me. The dalet of לדבר looks like a dalet, although it looks a bit more like B"Y than Sepharadi.
ReplyDeleteThe second zayin of Mezuzot is long, but the foot does not reach the disqualifying length of 3 kolmosim. As such, in this case, we have a safek of how it will be read, so we must show it to a tinok. If read as a ZAYIN we may go ahead and scrape a bit of the length. If not, Passul.
ReplyDeleteThe Daleth does not look like a Zayin. Kasher
The Boro Park poskim would passel the zayin but alow the daled (proob with tinok).
ReplyDeleteThe Yerushalmi poskim would passel the daled and allow the zayin (prob with tinok)
Rav Friedlander was machshir the Nun. No tinok required. He said the Dalet required a tinok and if he was machshir, it was kosher "bedieved shebedieved".
ReplyDelete"Rav Friedlander was machsir the nun", that means that the zayin is passul?
ReplyDeleteIf the daled is kosher, i think the vav of uv'lechtecha would be a kosher raish or at least a shaalas tinok.
The zayin looks like its the same length as the nun of תתן
ReplyDeleteWhoops! machshir the Zayin! Thanks for catching that!
ReplyDeleteThe nun of תתן is longer and goes down lower than the surrounding letters. Also, note one these pictures are from different ksavim.
ReplyDeleteVav of uvlechtcha is a ST at worst. I think it just makes it.