Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
I don't think so, menumer is more when there is a pattern but one odd yeriya I don't think qualifies
ReplyDeletekosher
ReplyDeleteyou can technically write a 24 line sefer tora and only shiras hayam 42 lines
would it begin to be a problem if there were multiple replacement yerios? What if some of the yerios are in Beis Yosef and some in Ari? Usually the sources talk about menumer in context of the ksav itself (e.g. Keset warning us not to leave a whole sefer worth of sheimos for the end) but at what point does it become an issue with replacement yerios?
ReplyDelete