Nun of nafshicha

By -


Comments

  1. Y.Y.October 28, 2015 at 9:50 AM

    To my eyes it does not seem questionable. So much so, that it took me some time until I realized what your question might even be... (I'm assuming that it's a bit wide).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yerachmiel AskotzkyOctober 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM

      According to you there is no problem or that it's clearly pasul?

      Delete
    2. Y.Y.October 28, 2015 at 3:26 PM

      I'll be honest: I couldn't see the problem...

      Delete
    3. Y.Y.October 28, 2015 at 3:27 PM

      I'll be honest: I couldn't see the problem...

      Delete
    4. Yerachmiel AskotzkyOctober 28, 2015 at 5:32 PM

      This is a serious shaila. I suggested to the customer to replace the mezuzah so I didn't have to pasken whether it was a psul or shailas tinok. My leaning is to pasel. I hope to eventually show it to Rav Friedlander for my edification.

      Delete
    5. Yerachmiel AskotzkyOctober 29, 2015 at 11:56 AM

      To clarify, I didn't suggest to replace it to get out of paskening. I meant, I wasn't forced into having to pasken...

      Delete
    6. RuminantKatzOctober 29, 2015 at 7:32 PM

      I would say that that's a kaf with taggin.

      Delete
  2. YankevOctober 28, 2015 at 10:58 AM

    שאלת תינוק

    ReplyDelete
  3. Moshe Ber zirkindOctober 28, 2015 at 12:00 PM

    Looks pasul to me

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zev MOctober 28, 2015 at 6:58 PM

    for those that are saying it's a She'alas Tinok, do you have to cover the Tagim? To me, after covering them it looks live a safek Chaf or Bais

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YankevOctober 29, 2015 at 3:12 PM

      Exactly, that's why the Tinok has to decide. You only have to cover the Tagin if the Tinok would be smart enough to know it's a nun just by the Tagin. Which might make him a תינוק חכם anyway

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Klaff Tanning question:

By -
I received this question via email. I am not really a klaf expert, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question:   Dear Rabbi Gutnick,   I am writing to you because a good friend of mine has put the idea into my head that the klaf in my tefillin were not really tanned and therefore are not kosher. He referred me to Megilla 19a re diftera.   From the research that I have done so far, it seems that the klaf that is used today is tanned only with a lime wash. On all of the tanning websites I’ve seen so far, they say that the lime doesn’t accomplish tanning but only the removal of the hair and some other pre-tanning effects.   Would you be able to explain to me or refer me to a website that explains how the tanning process that is used today takes the hide out of the category of diftera?   Thank you very much.    
Read more

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more