חכמים הזהרו בדבריכם

By -
A sofer that wrote megilos for me started to write tefilin.At first glance I told him his ך are very problematic. Unfortunately he asked a local rav in Israel that told they are kosher- had the rov told him shalas tinok and explained to him that letters should be written without any sfeikot then the rest of his parshios would of been kosher.
please your thoughts which ones pass without tinok which need tinok and which tinok wont help

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2016 at 9:14 PM

    I don't really see exactly what's the problem with the lange chofs

    ReplyDelete
  2. YankevFebruary 22, 2016 at 1:06 PM

    Technically they should all be Shaylas Tinok but I highly doubt first levavcha and second baderech would be kosher.
    Also he writes hey many times with a flat regel which is problematic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yerachmiel AskotzkyFebruary 28, 2016 at 11:02 PM

    Some of the legs of the Dalets are too long. The regel of the Heis in the Shem are too wide. The left legs of the first Heis in the Shemos are only a kulmus tall.

    All chaf peshutas should be ST's? There are certainly some and a few are likely shailas chachams. Is the rav who was asked an expert in Stam? Apparently not.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more