ויזתא

By -
According to shitos that the vav gets a head up
Is this the correct tzura? 


or should be like this
מחבר:צריך להאריך בואו דויזתא (בכתיבתה וי"א בקריאתה) ובמ"ב  למתוח ראשה הכפוף ותהיה כעין זקופה לרמז שנתלו כולם בזקיפה אחת. ובשעה"צ ר"ן והובא בט"ז ועכשיו לא נהגו כך אלא כדעת האומרים שיהיה הויו גדולה מאלפא ביתא של אותיות גדולות כמו שכתב הרא"ש
ובקסת וצריכין להאריך בוי"ו דויזתא ויהיה ראשה (ה)כפוף קצת בזקיפה באלכסון למעלה ***(וי"א דיאריך בקריאתה:)

every print has a different  כזה***

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2016 at 9:18 PM

    I personally understand like in the second picture, the whole Vov head facing upward (I notice that it's twice the same Vayzoso in both pictures).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beis HastamFebruary 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM

      Yes it is the same, Before selling megilos I do mishmeres stam computer even thought he sofer checked by tor and I correct the veizasa-many are not rabosi and some are just a big yud

      Delete
    2. Beis HastamFebruary 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM

      Yes it is the same, Before selling megilos I do mishmeres stam computer even thought he sofer checked by tor and I correct the veizasa-many are not rabosi and some are just a big yud

      Delete
  2. UnknownFebruary 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM

    I believe that it's like the second picture as well, though I cannot provide a source.

    ReplyDelete
  3. moshe weinerFebruary 22, 2016 at 1:07 AM

    התמונה השניה - זה הפירוש ראשו בזקיפה

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alberto AttiaFebruary 23, 2016 at 1:50 AM

    In the kavanot written in the name of the Arizal we find instructions (contrary to what we find in the Guemara)... that the ZAYIN of VAYZATA should be made large... and VAV small. Has any one seen a Megillah written that way?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:06 PM

      please give source with exact address,I have a feeling its a typo

      Delete
    2. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:06 PM

      please give source with exact address,I have a feeling its a typo

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more