ויזתא

By -
According to shitos that the vav gets a head up
Is this the correct tzura? 


or should be like this
מחבר:צריך להאריך בואו דויזתא (בכתיבתה וי"א בקריאתה) ובמ"ב  למתוח ראשה הכפוף ותהיה כעין זקופה לרמז שנתלו כולם בזקיפה אחת. ובשעה"צ ר"ן והובא בט"ז ועכשיו לא נהגו כך אלא כדעת האומרים שיהיה הויו גדולה מאלפא ביתא של אותיות גדולות כמו שכתב הרא"ש
ובקסת וצריכין להאריך בוי"ו דויזתא ויהיה ראשה (ה)כפוף קצת בזקיפה באלכסון למעלה ***(וי"א דיאריך בקריאתה:)

every print has a different  כזה***

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2016 at 9:18 PM

    I personally understand like in the second picture, the whole Vov head facing upward (I notice that it's twice the same Vayzoso in both pictures).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beis HastamFebruary 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM

      Yes it is the same, Before selling megilos I do mishmeres stam computer even thought he sofer checked by tor and I correct the veizasa-many are not rabosi and some are just a big yud

      Delete
    2. Beis HastamFebruary 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM

      Yes it is the same, Before selling megilos I do mishmeres stam computer even thought he sofer checked by tor and I correct the veizasa-many are not rabosi and some are just a big yud

      Delete
  2. UnknownFebruary 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM

    I believe that it's like the second picture as well, though I cannot provide a source.

    ReplyDelete
  3. moshe weinerFebruary 22, 2016 at 1:07 AM

    התמונה השניה - זה הפירוש ראשו בזקיפה

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alberto AttiaFebruary 23, 2016 at 1:50 AM

    In the kavanot written in the name of the Arizal we find instructions (contrary to what we find in the Guemara)... that the ZAYIN of VAYZATA should be made large... and VAV small. Has any one seen a Megillah written that way?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:06 PM

      please give source with exact address,I have a feeling its a typo

      Delete
    2. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:06 PM

      please give source with exact address,I have a feeling its a typo

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

The forum is back online...for reference and research purposes.

By -
 Dear Readers and Members, The forum has been down for over 6 months because the domain name (www.stamforum.com) lapsed and it is no longer available to re purchase. Although this forum is now defunct (it has morphed into several whatsapp groups), I have had many requests to put it back online because it contains so much information (over 1,800 posts and thousands of comments in the discussions, on a wide range of topics related to STa"M). I have therefore put the forum back online at blogger, so the address is www.stamforum.blogspot.com. The forum lasted for a decade...not a bad effort! It was pretty popular back in the days before whatsapp and managed to receive over a million hits in it's short life. It was one of the only organised forums in the  STa"M world and definitely the largest in it's heyday. I would like to thank all those who cobtributed over the years, particularly the early members who helped build it up. Thanking you all, Eli
Read more