FRUM TINOK

By -
many times there is a tiny pgima, this was a bit worsesince it has a kotz sticking out, this is the first time a tinok called it gimel.

The first vav passed but the second vav was read as a zein. I tested the tinok and came back to this shaila after asking many random letters and he said zein again, He then started doubting if its vav or obviously posul.

Comments

  1. Avi H.February 8, 2016 at 8:01 PM

    Wow! From the picture I'm not sure I even would've made a shaylas tinok. I'll keep this in mind iy"H. Yasher Koach! Agav, I like the peys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Avi H.February 8, 2016 at 8:02 PM

      The pey in the second picture obviously.

      Delete
    2. pesachFebruary 9, 2016 at 1:49 AM

      Reb Eli,

      i had a very similar case with a mezuzah i had written. when i gave it to reb yakov long to look at he told me that it was a shailas chacham because of how subtle it was. i brought it to rav mordechai friedlander. he held it up to the light, turned it every which way, took off his glasses, closed-then-reopened his eyes....he didn't even want to say that it was 'pasul' but he said it had to be 'put away.' i believe your tinok is on to something, mate.

      Delete
    3. Avi H.February 9, 2016 at 8:37 AM

      You had a case like the nun or the vav?

      Delete
    4. Rabbi Eli GutnickFebruary 9, 2016 at 11:09 AM

      Any pgam substantially less than a regular gimmel will still be geder shailos tinok. If the P'gam was "subtle" why did R Friedlander put aside without shailos tinok?

      Delete
    5. Rabbi Eli GutnickFebruary 9, 2016 at 11:14 AM

      Unless you're talking about the vov, which would also warrant S"T if it was indeed subtle. If it was a gimmel or vov similar to these pics surely it should (at worst) be a S"T

      Delete
    6. Beis HastamFebruary 16, 2016 at 7:12 PM

      There is a major difference between a pgima and a little kotz sticking out

      Delete
  2. AharonFebruary 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM

    The Vav of Uchsavtem appears to have similar characteristics

    ReplyDelete
  3. Avi H.February 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM

    My first comment was regarding the second picture. As far as the giel-nun, I would be afraid to even make a shaylas tinok, since such gimels are often not recognizable to out tinokos nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Avi H.February 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more