never seen this before...
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
The forum is back online...for reference and research purposes.
Dear Readers and Members, The forum has been down for over 6 months because the domain name (www.stamforum.com) lapsed and it is no longer available to re purchase. Although this forum is now defunct (it has morphed into several whatsapp groups), I have had many requests to put it back online because it contains so much information (over 1,800 posts and thousands of comments in the discussions, on a wide range of topics related to STa"M). I have therefore put the forum back online at blogger, so the address is www.stamforum.blogspot.com. The forum lasted for a decade...not a bad effort! It was pretty popular back in the days before whatsapp and managed to receive over a million hits in it's short life. It was one of the only organised forums in the STa"M world and definitely the largest in it's heyday. I would like to thank all those who cobtributed over the years, particularly the early members who helped build it up. Thanking you all, Eli
It seems to me that it's Passul.
ReplyDeleteHowever, separating the Parshiyos may be a solution.
I thought so too but seems there are many opinions that it's not meakev (even with no gap at all) see Mishnas hasofer siman 26.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I was thinking to fix by erasing from the shem and rewriting the last few words more compact, thereby creating a proper space...
I thought so too but seems there are many opinions that it's not meakev (even with no gap at all) see Mishnas hasofer siman 26.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I was thinking to fix by erasing from the shem and rewriting the last few words more compact, thereby creating a proper space...
this mistake happened because sofer used rashi tikun, if it was never used as rabeinu tam yet perhaps you can cut it up and glue it back as a rashi.
ReplyDeleteGood idea, but they are not new, they have been used as r"t for 20 years so would be problematic to switch to Rashi because already used for R"T
Delete