shayloh on extended kotz (r"t) on yud

By -
Om the yud below of   "mibais"   the magiha was strengthening the kotz R"T and overdid it. The addition was made after the kesivah, which could be a redeeming factor. Other redeeming factors include that both the right regel and kotz are not long (less of a shailo and ches) and also, the kotz does not come down quite as low as the regel.

Thoughts?

Comments

  1. moshe weinerMarch 1, 2016 at 11:52 AM

    אני חושב שאחר קריאת התינוק [שיקראנה יו"ד ולא חי"ת] מותר לתקן להאריך רגל ימין מעט יותר

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alberto AttiaMarch 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM

    Hi Eli,
    There also appears to be a very light NEGIYAH between the VAV and AYIN of LEMO'ADAH. Please double check.

    ReplyDelete
  3. yisroel levinMarch 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM

    ביתי"ן שהם עגולים למעלה כמו רי"ש ...דיעבד משמע ודאי דהוא כשר ...ומ"מ נ"ל דזה יש לתקן לעשותן מרובעי' דכיון דא"צ לגרור רק להוסיף מעט דיו ודאי ראוי לתקן

    צ"צ יו"ד סימן רה בסופו

    ReplyDelete
  4. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:03 PM

    yisroel levin brings up a valid point

    ReplyDelete
  5. Beis HastamMarch 1, 2016 at 11:04 PM

    yisroel levin brings up a valid point

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rabbi Eli GutnickMarch 2, 2016 at 8:27 AM

    This parsha is bedieved on many counts. Top heavy nuns, long (wide) left regel of hay, round bais, square vov etc. Also lots of lechatchilla l'eksivah issues such as oketz on middle head of shin, oketz on back bottom of aleph, heads not klapei maalah, etc etc.

    To bring it up to standard = a lot of work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. yisroel levinMarch 2, 2016 at 10:51 PM

    דכיון דא"צ לגרור, רק להוסיף מעט דיו, ודאי ראוי לתקן

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rabbi Eli GutnickMarch 5, 2016 at 5:29 AM

      Gut voch.

      Most of the other bedieved or not lechatchillah items can be fixed by adding ink and not scratching. So they are in the same geder

      Delete
  8. Yerachmiel AskotzkyMarch 12, 2016 at 4:03 PM

    Due to the thickness of the oketz, I'd deem this a SC.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more