קוים משוכים בשוה

By -
מבואר בשו"ע שיוד"י האלפי"ן שיני"ן וצדי"ן וכיוצא בהן, אם היו מדובקים לגג או לצואר האות [ונעשו קו משוך בשוה - גולם, ולא נקודה כעין יו"ד] הרי זה פסול, משום שינוי בצורת האות.
נראה פשוט, שאם רוב הניכר של היו"ד מדובק, ואין ראשו בולט אלא מעט, חשיב גולם ופסול [עד שיתקן]. ולא מועיל המעט שעודף להיחשב כראש היו"ד, דלא מצאנו הראש שיהא טפל ובטל כ"כ במיעוטו לגבי רגל עבה ושמן.

Comments

  1. AharonApril 25, 2016 at 9:57 AM

    איך יועיל תיקון. אם פסולה משום ליקוי בצורת האות (שודאי כן הוא) למה אין בזה משום שלא כסדרן

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YankevApril 25, 2016 at 11:38 AM

      מסתמא משום שאינו "קו משוך בשווה" גמור ואין להחמיר עד כדי איסור תיקון, ובפרט שיש סוברים שמותר לתקן קו משוך בשווה ואין בזה משום "שלא כסדרן".

      Delete
  2. YankevApril 25, 2016 at 11:40 AM

    I am astounded that R' Moshe writes "נראה פשוט" about this. Seems to me like a tremendous chiddush and against the prevailing assumption.

    ReplyDelete
  3. moshe weinerApril 25, 2016 at 1:31 PM

    גם עכשיו אני אומר שזה נראה לי פשוט
    איך אפשר להפוך הטפל לעיקר

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y.Y.April 25, 2016 at 9:32 PM

      1) "Tofel", "Ikar"???

      Where is the makor that a regel is a tafel and a rosh is an ikar in this context.

      2) Ein shiur le'ovi ha'osios.

      3) I get the perspective but its not sufficient to Passel without a source in Sha"s and Poskim.

      Delete
  4. Rabbi Eli GutnickApril 25, 2016 at 6:10 PM

    All Poskim I've ever discussed this with seem to say it's kosher even if a mashehu or small kav is bolet (protrudes). Sofek kav mashuch usually refers to a case where it gets thicker or curves slightly but no blita at all. I have had cases even worse than the above which have been deemed kosher (without tikun) by tier 1 poskim.

    However practically Reb Moshe's "chumra" has no lasting ramifications, since if this is encountered by a magiha, its probably kedai to fix it a little anyway (by adding a touch of ink)....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yerachmiel AskotzkyApril 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM

    The 3 samples presented are kosher as is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more