Reish / yud shailo in Gett

By -
The reish from "Geoffrey" . The Gett was already written and sent with a shliach, and the shailo noticed by the receiving Beis Din. So it cannot be fixed...
Does it need to be rewritten?

Comments

  1. Alberto AttiaJuly 10, 2016 at 1:49 PM

    By writing "DeMitkarei Geoffrey" this name has the same status as the SHEM IKAR - The Get must be re-written due to the misspelling. see EVEN HAEZER 129

    ReplyDelete
  2. YankevJuly 10, 2016 at 5:51 PM

    Shaylas Tinok!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Avi H.July 10, 2016 at 7:39 PM

    isn't it obvious that this is a shaylas tinok?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM

      The tinok said it's a big yud and then a little yud. But since the "reish" follows a pay (and ayin) which extend lower than other letters, the child was likely thrown off by that. I suggested the beis Din cover those letters but they said it's such a problematic tzurah they are going to rewrite the get rather tha make a "tinok circus" as 1)the husband was willing and 2) they are dealing with a chshash issue kores and there is no reason to look for leniency due to 1) above...

      Delete
    2. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM

      *issue = issur

      Delete
    3. Dovid Nissan BressmanJuly 11, 2016 at 3:32 PM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  4. YankevJuly 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM

    The Beis Din is absolutely right--without a "glatt kosher" shalas tinok, חלילה להקל בזה שלא במקום עיגון

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 12, 2016 at 12:08 AM

    Yes, I know even by Sta"m Rav Friedlander differentiates between shailos tinok lekulah and shailos tinok lechumrah.

    If it's not a "glatt" shailos tinok he may only be machshir bedieved

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

The forum is back online...for reference and research purposes.

By -
 Dear Readers and Members, The forum has been down for over 6 months because the domain name (www.stamforum.com) lapsed and it is no longer available to re purchase. Although this forum is now defunct (it has morphed into several whatsapp groups), I have had many requests to put it back online because it contains so much information (over 1,800 posts and thousands of comments in the discussions, on a wide range of topics related to STa"M). I have therefore put the forum back online at blogger, so the address is www.stamforum.blogspot.com. The forum lasted for a decade...not a bad effort! It was pretty popular back in the days before whatsapp and managed to receive over a million hits in it's short life. It was one of the only organised forums in the  STa"M world and definitely the largest in it's heyday. I would like to thank all those who cobtributed over the years, particularly the early members who helped build it up. Thanking you all, Eli
Read more