Reish / yud shailo in Gett

By -
The reish from "Geoffrey" . The Gett was already written and sent with a shliach, and the shailo noticed by the receiving Beis Din. So it cannot be fixed...
Does it need to be rewritten?

Comments

  1. Alberto AttiaJuly 10, 2016 at 1:49 PM

    By writing "DeMitkarei Geoffrey" this name has the same status as the SHEM IKAR - The Get must be re-written due to the misspelling. see EVEN HAEZER 129

    ReplyDelete
  2. YankevJuly 10, 2016 at 5:51 PM

    Shaylas Tinok!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Avi H.July 10, 2016 at 7:39 PM

    isn't it obvious that this is a shaylas tinok?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM

      The tinok said it's a big yud and then a little yud. But since the "reish" follows a pay (and ayin) which extend lower than other letters, the child was likely thrown off by that. I suggested the beis Din cover those letters but they said it's such a problematic tzurah they are going to rewrite the get rather tha make a "tinok circus" as 1)the husband was willing and 2) they are dealing with a chshash issue kores and there is no reason to look for leniency due to 1) above...

      Delete
    2. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM

      *issue = issur

      Delete
    3. Dovid Nissan BressmanJuly 11, 2016 at 3:32 PM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  4. YankevJuly 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM

    The Beis Din is absolutely right--without a "glatt kosher" shalas tinok, חלילה להקל בזה שלא במקום עיגון

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rabbi Eli GutnickJuly 12, 2016 at 12:08 AM

    Yes, I know even by Sta"m Rav Friedlander differentiates between shailos tinok lekulah and shailos tinok lechumrah.

    If it's not a "glatt" shailos tinok he may only be machshir bedieved

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Klaff Tanning question:

By -
I received this question via email. I am not really a klaf expert, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question:   Dear Rabbi Gutnick,   I am writing to you because a good friend of mine has put the idea into my head that the klaf in my tefillin were not really tanned and therefore are not kosher. He referred me to Megilla 19a re diftera.   From the research that I have done so far, it seems that the klaf that is used today is tanned only with a lime wash. On all of the tanning websites I’ve seen so far, they say that the lime doesn’t accomplish tanning but only the removal of the hair and some other pre-tanning effects.   Would you be able to explain to me or refer me to a website that explains how the tanning process that is used today takes the hide out of the category of diftera?   Thank you very much.    
Read more

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more