גולם פסול
לענ"ד זה גולם, כי רובו מדובק לגוף. והמעט שבולט אינו גוף ועיקר היו"ד
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Question to Yosef Chaim B
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
I had this thought many times, but from my experience it seems that the rabanim never pasul this, and if i argue the above point they say maximum it a sofek kav mashuch beshave and fixing is allowed.
ReplyDeleteIf we were to fix by adding a thin rosh would it be kosher?
מה שאתה אומר זה נכון - הרבנים מכשירים בגלל שיש משהו עובר
ReplyDeleteלכן נראה שבמקרה זה מותר לתקנו בהוספת דיו
אבל התכוונתי בעיקר לומר - שעד שיתקנו יש בזה פיסול