A place for English speaking sofrim (scribes), magihim (examiners), rabbis and vendors of Stam (Torah, Tefillin and Mezuzah scrolls) from around the world to communicate, share ideas, ask questions and offer support and advice.
I just want to point out: your original assumption has logic in it.
Your question now too is logical.
My question is: on which SOURCES do you base your assumptions:)
Things in Halacha and in this field especially do not always follow the organic logic that we come up with.
The Yerushalmi in Berachos which discusses a nun and a vov touching is a prime example of a case in which it might have been acceptable as a teis - were it meant to be a teis - but can be scraped apart - were it not meant to be a teis.
One who learns the Shut of Acharonim will find such patterns in numerous places:)
yes see mahrshag (its one of the first simamim) when chaf is close enough to vav it can be used as chaf vav or corrected to be used as mem. he brings a similar situation with a line in the lungs that must have 5 compartments can be counted either way
yes see mahrshag (its one of the first simamim) when chaf is close enough to vav it can be used as chaf vav or corrected to be used as mem. he brings a similar situation with a line in the lungs that must have 5 compartments can be counted either way
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן. Nor are we interested in those who said to use עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is דיו עשן of good quality that does not ...
If this would be a Tzadik P'shuta, would it be Kosher?
ReplyDeleteEven if it would be... on which sources do you base the assumption that its a two way street?
DeleteIs there such a thing as one Tzura being kosher as two different Osios?
Delete(When I say "kosher", I mean regarding the Tzura, not Mukaf Gvil considerations.)
I just want to point out: your original assumption has logic in it.
DeleteYour question now too is logical.
My question is: on which SOURCES do you base your assumptions:)
Things in Halacha and in this field especially do not always follow the organic logic that we come up with.
The Yerushalmi in Berachos which discusses a nun and a vov touching is a prime example of a case in which it might have been acceptable as a teis - were it meant to be a teis - but can be scraped apart - were it not meant to be a teis.
One who learns the Shut of Acharonim will find such patterns in numerous places:)
Please tell me where this Yerushalmi Brachos is ...
Deleteno
ReplyDeleteyes see mahrshag (its one of the first simamim) when chaf is close enough to vav it can be used as chaf vav or corrected to be used as mem. he brings a similar situation with a line in the lungs that must have 5 compartments can be counted either way
ReplyDeleteyes see mahrshag (its one of the first simamim) when chaf is close enough to vav it can be used as chaf vav or corrected to be used as mem. he brings a similar situation with a line in the lungs that must have 5 compartments can be counted either way
ReplyDelete