צד"י [כתב אר"י] נפסק היו"ד - לענין תיקון

By -
הדין במקרה זה: אם ניכר לעין שיש כאן שתי אותיות, אי אפשר לתקן בתו"מ שלא כסדרן. ואם ספק אזי מועיל קריאת התינוק, ואם קוראו צ' - מותר לתקן בתו"מ.
בנוגע לכתב האר"י - היות שהצ' אינו דומה כל כך לנו"ן [בכתב זה] ויו"ד, משום שהנו"ן כפופה מאוד, והיו"ד הפוכה, יש מקילים.
למעשה אין למהר ולהקל כל כך, אלא רק אם ספק מה הצורה שלפנינו. לפי התמונה הנראית כאן - זה נראה יותר כאות צ'.
היות שההבחנה במקרים אלו גבולית, קשה לסמוך על תמונה בסקן להחליט הדבר [אע"פ שבמקרה שלפנינו היות שהכתב קטן יותר מהתמונה, כמעט ברור שמסקנת הרואה במציאות תהא זהה לרואה בסקן].

ראה גם: https://hebrewstam.blogspot.com/2018/08/blog-post_16.html

Comments

  1. yisroel levinMarch 26, 2019 at 6:51 PM

    Thank you very much for posting and explaining your thoughts, rather then "Paskening" via a digital image.

    Though, sources would be appreciated too, so when necessary we'll have what to present to the Rov. as recommended by קול סופרים, paragraph 25 in the beginning of his Sefer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yerachmiel AskotzkyMarch 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM

    Admittedly this is a lower quality image. In addition, in order to judge whether a split is lehedia or not, one needs to see the original/actual size.

    If this isn't considered a letter that may be split into 2 letters, because it's Arizal and the Yud is backwards (and possibly because of the Nun, even though I'd be less inclined to take it into consideration since it does seem to pass for a poorly written Nun (and because I've never seen this brought down (source anyone?) for not considering a split [Bais Yosef] tzadi as not 2 letters) then, if not lehedia, a tinok wouldn't need to be asked.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more