גימ"ל - ללא ראש

By -
הגימ"ל הראשון [גבלך] אין לה ראש אמיתי. אמנם יש בה בליטה הניכרת, אך עיקר ראשה שוה לירכה, ואין זה נחשב לראש העובר על הירך, כפי שמבואר בב"י שראש הג' כזיי"ן שצ"ל עובר על הירך היטב (גם העושים צורת ראשה כוי"ו, אינם חולקים על פרט זה שצ"ל הראש עובר היטב). ולכן חייב לתקנה [ואני חושש לפסלה עד התיקון משום חסר ראש, ושינוי צורתה]

Comments

  1. Rabbi Eli GutnickMarch 11, 2019 at 9:07 AM

    I fail to understand, to me it looks like it has a distinct rosh...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Daniel GoldsteinMarch 11, 2019 at 9:14 AM

    Both gimels have the same problem. Or only the first one?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yerachmiel AskotzkyMarch 11, 2019 at 5:19 PM

    Rav Moshe is referring to the first one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AharonMarch 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AharonMarch 12, 2019 at 10:24 AM

    ואני חושש לפסלה עד התיקון משום חסר ראש, ושינוי צורתה

    Not sure I understand. If there is שינוי צורה, doesn't fixing it constitute שלא כסדרן ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. moshe weinerMarch 12, 2019 at 1:37 PM

      אני חושש לפסלה משום שהוא גולם, ולכן מציע שיש לתקן הראש. ותיקון הראש מותר, אע"פ שיתכן שהיא פסולה בלעדי התיקון כמבואר בכמה אחרונים בנוגע לתיקון הגלמים

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more