Different mezuzos in same house

By -
Someone asked me to source them various mezuzos but only wanted to spend a minimum amount (and therefore wanted basic mezuzos). i could offer them basic ARI mezuzos or mid range BY. I know that they have some mezuzos up which are BY.
They are not observant yet so don’t really have a minhag.
Is it problematic to have different mezuzos with different csav up in the same house?
Should I push for them to have the mid range BY over the basic ARI ?
Would appreciate your opinions. Thanks

Comments

  1. Yerachmiel AskotzkyJanuary 22, 2020 at 10:16 AM

    It is proper for the mezuzahs to be the same minhag.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Avi H.January 22, 2020 at 5:34 PM

    For someone unobservant, that should be their biggest issue. I once commented to Rabbi Duvid Laib Greenfeld about the fact that in the Vaad Mishmeres STaM office in Boro Park some of the mezuzos were BY and others were Ari. He said, "What's the problem? BY is good and Ariza"l is good!" I think that it is quite misplaced to start putting "Chazon Ish chumros" on mechalelei Shabbos. Halevai the mezuzos should be kosher.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Boro Park SoferJanuary 23, 2020 at 1:41 AM

    I agree with Avi H. "that it is quite misplaced to start putting "Chazon Ish chumros" on mechalelei Shabbos. Halevai the mezuzos should be kosher."

    But regarding the very subject, this is a Shailah that is already mentioned in a lot of Poskim, I'll Just quote a few:

    שו"ת השיב משה יו"ד סימן נ"א is Machshir even if in one Sefer Torah half is written with a Tzadi Ar"i and half is written with a Tzadi Beis Yosef.

    ספר משנת אברהם סימן כ"ג סעיף פ"ז regarding a S"T or Tefillin that have both Tzadi's he writes "כבר פסקו כל גדולי מדינת פולין שפסולין בלי ספק" and he continues that even if the whole S"T is written with one Tzura of Tzadi and the Tefillin is written with a different Tzura of Tzadi one shall not be Oleh to the S"T with these Tefillin because it is a תרתי דסתרי.

    שו"ת ויחי יעקב יו"ד סימן ע' discuses this Shailah "Different mezuzos in same house" and his opinion is that it shouldn't be done, and he adds that his Psak has been told to the Sefas Emes of Gur Zatza"l and he agreed to it.

    These are just a few Poskim dealing with this Shailah, and there are many more. ואכהמ"ל.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher

By -
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always  מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך  . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
Read more

Question to Yosef Chaim B

By -
Thank you for commenting on my ink article. In your comment you stated: "Many poskim disagree... Many rishonim have clearly stated the use of our ingredients." Would you please be kind enough to teach us (so I can include it in the article) which Poskim and what exactly and where did they say that the עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן  that does not fail? We are not interested in biased פילפולים , or in those who said that  דיו עשן is not being used because it fails easily or because it was not known how to make good quality דיו עשן.  Nor are we interested in those who said to use  עפצים וקנקנתום וגומא ואין לשנות when they discussed specifically the עפצים וקנקנתום type of ink. We are interested to find out where and who (if any) said explicitly, based on sources, that the  עפצים וקנקנתום  type of ink is preferable over good quality דיו עשן , even when there is  דיו עשן  of good quality that does not ...
Read more